KangaROOS

Rated: Not good enough

price: $$$$

location: United States

KangaROOS is not taking adequate steps to ensure payment of a living wage for its workers.

KangaROOS sustainability rating

Planet

2 out of 5

People

2 out of 5

Animals

2 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


KangaROOS is owned by Pentland.

Its environment rating is 'not good enough'. It uses some eco-friendly materials including recycled materials. There is no evidence it implements water reduction initiatives. There is no evidence it reduces its carbon and other greenhouse gas emissions in its supply chain. There is no evidence it minimises textile waste.

Its labour rating is 'not good enough'. It has a Code of Conduct that covers all of the ILO Four Fundamental Freedoms principles. There is no evidence it has worker empowerment initiatives such as collective bargaining or rights to make a complaint. There is no evidence it ensures payment of a living wage in its supply chain. It audits some of its supply chain. It does not disclose any policies or safeguards to protect suppliers and workers in its supply chain from the impacts of COVID-19.

Its animal rating is 'not good enough'. It has a general statement about minimising animal suffering but not a formal animal welfare policy. It uses leather. It does not use wool, exotic animal hair, down, fur, angora or exotic animal skin.

KangaROOS is rated 'Not good enough' overall.

Last updated December 2022